Helping You Handle Your University Administrative Cases
University Issues
Get the aggressive representation you deserve
Washington State University Conduct Board hears matters that result in suspension or expulsion of a student. Also, the Conduct Board hears cases that involve harm to a person or a person’s property and the accused disputes the facts and/or denies responsibility. Before the Conduct Board hears a case, the University completes and investigation. The University also investigates faculty accused of sexual harassment, discrimination, and other issues.
The University may not always weigh the evidence correctly or may not provide the justice that every student or faculty member is entitled to. If you find you are being investigated or you have filed the complaint yourself, you have a right to an attorney who can help guide you through the process. You may also want to file an appeal and you may need an attorney’s guidance to file a persuasive appeal.
On December 9, 2016 there was a task force of WSU faculty, staff, students, alumni, and donors that reviewed the University’s conduct process and suggested changes in response to a December 1, 2016 Washington State of Appeals decision. As a result of that Washington State Appeals decision, the process the accused student goes through was changed.
In cases in which a student faces expulsion or suspension from the University, there will be an administrative hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge.
In the administrative hearing, lawyers can actually participate and the parties can call witnesses. Whether you are the Respondent or the Complainant, you will benefit with competent representation.
If you are a victim of sexual harassment or sexual assault, you have other options to pursue outside the University forum.
Prinz & Brozik has been advising students and faculty throughout University investigations and University hearings for many years. It can be an intimidating process if you are the accused or if you are the victim. It is best to hire an attorney from the beginning with the experience and the knowledge to guide you through the process. Give us a call at (509) 338-0908 for a consultation.
Common University Disciplinary Scenarios
For Students:
- Academic misconduct: Accusations of cheating, plagiarism, or improper collaboration.
- Behavioral misconduct: Violations of student codes involving drugs, alcohol, property damage, or disruptive conduct.
- Sexual misconduct and Title IX: Investigations involving harassment or assault under campus Title IX procedures.
- Residence hall violations: Noise complaints, visitor rule infractions, or property misuse.
- Unjust or retaliatory accusations: Concerns about unfair targeting or discriminatory discipline.
For Faculty, Administrators and Staff:
- Sexual harassment or discrimination claims.
- Professional misconduct investigations.
- Research ethics complaints.
- Breach of university policy or codes of conduct.
- Challenges to academic freedom or retaliation for protected expression.
- Breach of contract claims.
- Termination without cause.
- Employment issues.
Key Legal Issues in University Proceedings
- Due Process Concerns: Many institutions fail to provide notice of specific allegations or adequate opportunities to respond. We identify and challenge procedural deficiencies.
- Investigation Bias: University investigators or panels may act with preconceived judgments or inadequate neutrality. Our firm ensures fairness and objectivity.
- Evidentiary Thresholds: Most schools use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard—meaning that even slim margins of proof can lead to significant penalties.
- Overlap with Criminal Proceedings: When allegations also involve criminal conduct, we help protect clients' constitutional rights and manage strategic coordination between campus and legal defenses.
What to Expect from the Disciplinary Process
- Initial Report or Complaint
The process often begins with a report to university officials, sometimes anonymously. - Preliminary Investigation
Schools typically conduct fact-finding interviews, request written responses, and review digital communications or surveillance. - Hearing or Resolution Process
Depending on the nature of the case, this might involve a conduct board hearing, informal resolution, or Title IX live hearing. Rules regarding representation and cross-examination vary widely. - Sanction Determination
Outcomes may include warnings, probation, suspension, expulsion (for students), or formal reprimand, reassignment, or termination (for faculty or staff). - Appeal Rights
Most universities provide limited windows for appeal based on procedural error, new evidence, or disproportionate sanctions. We assist clients in framing appeals strategically and effectively.
How We Help
- Case Assessment: Reviewing complaints, evidence, and procedural posture to develop the strongest possible response.
- Hearing Preparation: Coaching clients for oral or written statements, advising on witness strategy, and preparing hearing scripts.
- Document Drafting: Preparing written responses, evidence packets, and appeal letters that directly address the institution’s decision criteria.
- Advisory Representation: Attending hearings (where allowed), reviewing correspondence, and managing communication with school administrators.
- Interdisciplinary Coordination: Managing parallel criminal or civil risks, particularly in Title IX or property damage cases.
Note: It’s best to hire an attorney early in the process—before any responses are filed—so we can advise you from the start and explore every opportunity to strengthen your case.
